For our afternoon lecture, we were fortunate enough to have
a founder and local political activist, Miguel Lago, join us to discuss his
recently launched non-profit civic engagement project: Meu Rio (“My Rio”). The
24-year-old Brazilian began his education in economics at the Pontifícia
Universidade Católica (PUC-Rio, our host university here in Rio), but opted to
finish his undergraduate studying political science in France, where he too
earned his Masters Degree.
As a result of our “daily debriefings,” or day-end group
reflections, I’ve become accustomed to critically thinking about
each and every speaker’s incentive, purpose, and overall goal … be that a
university professor, NGO speaker, business professionals, etc. Professor Miranda and Dr. Arbaláez have
assisted me in trying to think outside the box by not simply accepting
everything that Professionals/Scholars are putting on the table. While Brazil has much to be applauded
for, there are underlying factors and not all of these organizations are “in it”
just out of the goodness of their heart.
Reading between the lines can be challenging, but I’m thrilled to be
engaged in such critical thinking … I can feel my brain growing!! :)
However, I found Miguel’s lecture on Brazil’s current
political landscape to be innocently refreshing. He’s a young university graduate, which made him more
relatable. Furthermore, he was
just a happy youngster excited to share his vision: engaging Rio citizens into
the political system independent of any political coalition affiliation/funding/influence. Is that the reality? We’d never know. But
the fact that he kicked off his presentation by explaining a very complex
Brazilian political system in layman’s terms indicated to me that he found it important that we know the skeletal structure and from there on evaluate for ourselves. He didn’t pitch us on anything.
Much like the U.S., Brazil has a presidential system with a house
of representatives (Chamber of Deputies) and state senators (Federal Senate). Different, however, is the multitude of
political parties, which is typical of Latin America in general. According to Miguel, Brazil currently
has around thirty recognized political parties. With such a large political spectrum, it’s near impossible
to ever win a majority vote and as such, coalition governments have emerged as
the norm here. For instance,
although President Dilma Rousseff won the majority population’s vote in 2011,
her party (PT – Partido dos trabalhadores)
doesn’t have a majority in congress … where the diverse political party
affiliation/representation is most prevalent. As a result, getting initiatives passed through congress is
immensely difficult … concessions have to be made; thus the formation of
coalition governments, what Miguel then referred to as practically
parliamentary. In other words, given
the amount of political parties no majority will ever win and as such,
political parties join forces conceding ideals along the way … resulting in (depending
on how you look at it) a very representative government or one that is
fractious and simply unsuccessful given how many voices are in the
equation.
The primary challenge with the coalition practice is once it is established (case in point the Mexico’s PRI), it
then becomes near impossible for opposition governments to penetrate the
current system.
After presenting the skeletal structure of the Brazilian
political system and some of the challenges it faces, Miguel explained the
mission/purpose of the non-profit civic engagement project Meu Rio, which according to the website is: … é um movimento criado para incluir o cidadão comum nos processos de
decisão que estão transformando o Rio de Janeiro (… is a movement created in order to include the common citizen in
the decision processes that are transforming Rio de Janeiro). As mentioned previously, Miguel
had said that the organization is not affiliated with any government coalitions
or unions, and doesn’t receive any public funding at this time. However, it is just in its start-up
phase (having begun in Oct. 2011). The organization received it’s initial funding from
“think tank” type institutions. Miguel
did state that Meu Rio’s goal by 2016
is to reach at least 25% of Rio’s population and be totally member-funded.
Despite its relatively short existence, Meu Rio’s future appears bright given the young generation at the
helm and the organization’s call for a transparent government in everyday
affairs. While it receives a lot
of tips on government corruption cases, Miguel assured us that the
non-profit organization is not a sensational newspaper and creating trouble is
not their goal. They
simply wish to engage (primarily through media) the Rio population so that cariocas can have a voice in the
rapid changes taking place in their city today.
I also enjoyed the Meu Rio presentation. I found the presenter to be very charismatic and inspiring. You could also feel his passion and hope to improve the political landscape in Brazil as he discussed the current political problems. One thing he briefly mentioned was that in Brazil, voting is mandatory by all citizens. The presidential election also has two different rounds. The first round, all candidates are on the ballot. On the second round only the top two candidates are on the ballot and the candidate who gets the majority wins. Because voting is mandatory in Brazil, it is important for Brazilian citizens to be well informed about the choices they make when voting which is what Meu Rio is trying to do.
ReplyDelete